Meadville Tribune

State News

December 21, 2013

SUNDAY ISSUE: Shrinking Pa. Legislature could save big bucks

HARRISBURG — Pennsylvania lawmakers are moving to thin their ranks, potentially reducing the size of the second-largest state Legislature in the country.

The state House voted Tuesday to reduce the overall number of lawmakers in Harrisburg from 253 to 191 by eliminating 50 seats in the House and a dozen in the Senate.

The House has passed similar legislation before, only to have it die in the Senate. Republicans control both chambers, but the House tends to be more ideologically driven.

House Speaker Sam Smith, who says the plan will make the Legislature more efficient, has split the effort into two bills, one targeting the House and one the Senate. That way, even if there isn’t support in the Senate to eliminate seats there, the House reduction could still fly.

Under the plan, the state’s legislative maps would be redrawn under the same process used every decade.

In this case, the state would be divided into 153 House districts representing 83,421 people, rather than the current 63,000.

Cutting Senate seats to 38 would increase size of Senate districts to about 335,000 people from the current 225,000.

Rep. Richard Stevenson, R-Mercer County, said he supported the measure the last time Smith brought it up and still supports it, even if it will put some lawmakers in tough positions politically.

Every decade redistricting creates situations where some lawmakers must run against other incumbents because boundaries have changed, Stevenson said. In this case, almost every district would change dramatically, setting up incumbent-versus-incumbent contests all across the state, he said.

That’s not a problem for Stevenson. He’s already announced he’s retiring.

“I think there would be time for people to prepare and decide what they want to do,” he said.

But a large-scale redistricting concerns Democrats. The current process is led by a five-member panel made up of the party leaders in each chamber, plus one other commissioner.

Democrats tried to get an amendment passed to shift control of redrawing the legislative map to an independent, non-partisan group. That effort would have eliminated concerns about gerrymandering, said Rep. Bryan Barbin, D-Cambria County.

Barbin said Pennsylvania historically has had a large Legislature because 19th Century reformers thought more lawmakers would make it difficult for railroad titans to control the body. Barbin said he doesn’t think there’s any harm in getting rid of 50 seats in the House.

But other Democrats, including Rep. Greg Vitali, D-Delaware County, who opposed the reduction on Tuesday, said the same concerns from the 19th Century remain valid. Fewer lawmakers make it easier for special interest groups to hold sway.

State Rep. Chris Sainato, D-Lawrence County, agreed. “This is not about good government, it’s about power,” Sainato said.

One argument Smith raises in support of his plan is that it would improve efficiency within the chambers. It would also reduce cost.

“I can understand why (the speaker) likes his plan from an administrative standpoint,” said state Rep. Jaret Gibbons, D-Lawrence, who had proposed merging the Senate and House into one chamber. The House rejected Gibbons’ plan in a near party-line vote Monday.

“I still think mine is better,” Gibbons said, adding that he intended to vote for Smith’s plan. Merging the chambers would save $90 million a year, Gibbons said. Reducing the number of lawmakers would only save about $5 million a year.

Any cost-savings might be diminished if lawmakers hire more staff to deal with the larger districts, said Rep. Brad Roae, R-Crawford County.

“Many employers have had to cut back during these hard times. I think it’s only appropriate that we take action to downsize the state Legislature,” Roae said.

“We would have to make sure that the remaining lawmakers do not hire additional staff to avoid the complete erosion of these savings.”

As a proposed Constitutional amendment, the measure must pass the House and Senate in two consecutive sessions. It would then be put before the voters in 2015, at the earliest.

While lawmakers disagreed about the merits of different aspects of the proposal, they agreed on one thing. Any effort to reduce the size of the Legislature will resonate with voters.

“I don’t think the people are going to be the problem,” said state Rep. Fred Keller, R-Union County.

Only New Hampshire has more state lawmakers than Pennsylvania. But New Hampshire’s 424 lawmakers work part time and are paid $200 a year. State lawmakers in Pennsylvania are paid a base salary of $83,801 a year.

Text Only
State News
Business Marquee
AP Video
Official: Air Algerie Flight 'probably Crashed' TSA Administrator on Politics and Flight Bans Raw: National Guard Helps Battle WA Wildfires Raw: Ukraine's Donetsk Residents Flee Senators Push to End Hamas Threat in Cease-Fire A Young Victim's Premonition, Hug Before MH17 U.N. School in Gaza Hit by Israeli Strike Raw: Deadly Storm Hits Virginia Campground Officials Warn of Avoidable Death in Hot Cars Death Penalty Expert: 'This is a Turning Point' House Committee at Odds Over Obama Lawsuit Raw: MH17 Victim's Bodies Arrive in Netherlands Raw: UN School Used As Shelter Hit by Tank Shell Raw: Gunmen Attack Iraqi Prison Convoy Plane Leaves Ukraine With More Crash Victims The Rock Brings Star Power to Premiere Raw: Families Travel to Taiwan Plane Crash Site Arizona Execution Takes Almost Two Hours Crash Kills Teen Pilot Seeking World Record
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Stocks