Meadville Tribune

Opinion

September 25, 2013

Guns are only the problem because conservative owners allow them to be

To conservative gun owners: You believe that Americans are entitled to own guns, that the government should not regulate guns and that any laws that encourage the control of guns is anti-American. You believe this not because you think guns are inherently American, but because you are selfish. Before I point out the problems with your beliefs, let me acknowledge that, as a gun control advocate, there are things that you and I would agree on.

We would agree that guns kill people. Without discrimination, guns kill all races, genders and ages. We would agree that people have been killed by guns. And we would both agree that the U.S. Constitution explicitly mentions guns. That the authors of that document dedicated an entire amendment to guns proves that guns were important at the time that document was written. We would also agree that one side is right and the other is wrong. Either more guns will make America safer or they won’t.

Of course, not all conservatives share the same views. There are many on the political right who know that laws limiting the sale of guns and laws mandating extensive personal background checks will result in a decline in gun violence. These people, along with gun owners on the political left, can be described as “gun control moderates.” Comprising the vast space between the far left and far right, this group influences little about the gun control debate. In reality, the outcome of this debate is decided by the deep pockets of the conservative Republican right whose philosophy is supported by you, the conservative gun owner.

You continually cite the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution when defending your right to own a gun. This document, written more than 200 years ago, was undoubtedly penned with concern for the citizens of an infant country. Its words are a brilliant reflection of the interests of a nation forged from the fields of battle. It is a literary time capsule.

The problem, however, is that America has changed. Much of the Constitution is outdated and irrelevant. The Second Amendment sits firmly in this category. We both know this. If you believe, as I assume that you do, that the founders of this country would not support changing the Second Amendment to provide for the safety and protection of American citizens, you are wrong.

It should be clear that the path we have been taking, a path that you support, is allowing the violence plaguing this country to thrive. Let me be clear. In no way am I putting responsibility on your shoulders for the terrible gun massacres that have occurred throughout the U.S. Blame for the shootings at Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora, Fort Hood, Sandy Hook, and the D.C. Navy Yard fall solely on the cowards who pulled the triggers of the weapons that killed. But you perpetuate a philosophy that enabled the perpetrators of those shootings.

We both strongly condemn their actions. But when our social discourse leans toward developing comprehensive gun control measures, you are unwilling to budge. Your beliefs are the foundation that supports gun violence.

You believe that any measure, by individuals or the entire government, which limits your access to guns, is anti-American. This explains why gun owners like you continually call for an increase of guns following a tragedy. Even when 26 people died in the halls of Sandy Hook Elementary School, including 20 children; your answer was to arm teachers.

Just seven days after that massacre, National Rifle Association Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre famously remarked, “The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” There is no evidence that adding more guns to any situation will create a safer atmosphere. In fact, the shootings at Fort Hood and the D.C. Navy Yard occurred on facilities where guns were present. Of course, your argument will always be to cite the number killed, followed by there could have been more. Another gun would have not prevented the first death. Even one death is too many.

You believe that guns are a deterrent against government tyranny, that having guns easily available keeps the government in check. In reality, you are speculating on your own future safety and prioritizing it before the present safety of our society. This attitude, and the distrust of your own government, is both selfish and anti-American. The idea that “the government” will one day knock down your door, only to be scared away by the armory in your basement, is a fantasy. Can we conceive of an argument any more ridiculous than this?

If the murder of an entire first grade classroom is not enough for you to abandon your beliefs, one wonders what is. What better evidence is needed to show that something must change?

This debate matters. Your opinion on this issue matters. The desire to make real, substantial change in society must come from you. How many more children have to die before you understand that your beliefs about gun control are wrong?

The truth is, guns are the problem. But guns are only the problem because you allow them to be the problem. If you persist in your beliefs, and I suspect that you will, gun violence in this country will never stop.

Mattera grew up in Conneautville and graduated from Conneaut Valley High School in 2005. For the past year he has have lived in Arlington, Va., and is a graduate student at George Mason University, where he is studying public policy. He can be reached at tmattera@gmu.edu.

1
Text Only
Opinion
  • Many veterans suffer PTSD, which needs to be dealt with

    Initially, I intended this article to be about PTSD “Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.” I wanted to write about the myths and misconceptions that those four words may hold. But as the days went by, the story just wouldn’t come together for me. Everything I typed seemed to miss something. There was no feeling.

    April 17, 2014

  • Journalists in combat zones ‘write with light’ while risking their lives

    I first heard the news on National Public Radio on my car radio. On April 4, the day before elections in Afghanistan, an Afghan military officer walked up to a car in a convoy and opened fire. Anja Niedringhaus, a staff photographer for The Associated Press, died instantly.

    April 16, 2014

  • There’s no war on men and boys — it’s quite the opposite

    Two weeks ago, Paul Dici submitted an column titled “It’s time to fight against the war on men and boys” (March 28). Mr. Dici would have us believe that men and boys are being “wussified” by a progressive agenda that may jeopardize our national security. Also, he makes the point that men and boys are not given the same advantages (programs) as women and girls.

    April 14, 2014

  • McCord outsourcing ‘scandal’ reminds me of Y2K fears

    With only seven weeks to go until the May primary election, the campaigns are expected to get a lot hotter and more negative.

    April 13, 2014

  • Can we trust luck when it comes to the nuclear industry?

    Let’s review the history to better understand a major concern of today.

    April 11, 2014

  • Aging — is it a disease to be cured?

    If you are already old, get ready for what comes next. If you are not old yet but on the way, it is not too early to start thinking about aging and dying, because both are part of being human.

    April 10, 2014

  • Local high school students help keep future of journalism bright

    Significant technological and economic changes have caused some to question the future of journalism, both as a viable business enterprise and as a potential career. But if the proceedings of the eighth annual Northwest Pennsylvania High School Journalism Day are any indication, journalism is alive and well, especially in Crawford County.

    April 10, 2014

  • Reps want to hang ‘English only’ sign at the Capitol

    Pennsylvania, it turns out, is one of 19 states that have failed to address the menace that is non-English. Or maybe it’s un-English? Or dis-English? There must be a word for it.

    April 8, 2014

  • The Arc: A welcoming community of support

    Let me give you some background about services that The Arc of Crawford, Warren and Forest counties provide to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. These individuals are your neighbors, loved ones and family members.

    April 7, 2014 1 Story

  • Outside the Box: Gather information and weigh your options — but always go on your guts

    Years ago, I was working in my father’s home office. I grabbed a gold Cross pen to sign a letter. Hours later, my dad wanted to know where the pen was. He was insistent. What’s the big deal, I wondered.

    April 2, 2014

Business Marquee
AP Video
Captain of Sunken SKorean Ferry Arrested Raw: Fire Destroys 3 N.J. Beachfront Homes Raw: Pope Presides Over Good Friday Mass Raw: Space X Launches to Space Station Superheroes Descend on Capitol Mall Man Charged in Kansas City Highway Shootings Obama Awards Navy Football Trophy Anti-semitic Leaflets Posted in Eastern Ukraine Raw: Magnitude-7.2 Earthquake Shakes Mexico City Ceremony at MIT Remembers One of Boston's Finest Raw: Students Hurt in Colo. School Bus Crash Raw: Church Tries for Record With Chalk Jesus Raw: Faithful Celebrate Good Friday Worldwide Deadly Avalanche Sweeps Slopes of Mount Everest Police Arrest Suspect in Highway Shootings Drought Concerns May Hurt Lake Tourism Vermont Goat Meat Gives Refugees Taste of Home Calif. Investigators Re-construct Fatal Bus Cras Mayor Rob Ford Launches Re-election Campaign Appellate Court Hears Okla. Gay Marriage Case
Hyperlocal Search
Premier Guide
Find a business

Walking Fingers
Maps, Menus, Store hours, Coupons, and more...
Premier Guide
Stocks