Published June 30, 2009 11:43 pm - It took Crawford Central School Board a total of nine votes Monday night to pass the district’s 2009-10 budget and also approve an increase in school property taxes for district residents.
Death of language program helped keep tax hike down
By Mary Spicer
VERNON TOWNSHIP — It took Crawford Central School Board a total of nine votes Monday night to pass the district’s 2009-10 budget and also approve an increase in school property taxes for district residents.
Unfortunately, when summarizing the results in a story published in Tuesday’s Tribune, this reporter managed to combine the subject of the eighth vote — approval of the district’s $51.2-million 2009-10 budget, which passed by a 6-1 margin — with the 6-0 vote count in favor of the ninth vote, which set the district’s millage levy.
The final vote in favor of the district’s 2009-10 budget should have been reported as Asuman Baskan, John Christie-Searles, Carol Jones, David Miller, Stuart Rothman and Ross Prather in the majority, with Jan VanTuil casting the sole dissenting vote. Frank Schreck had already left the meeting and the resignation of the ninth member, Christine Lazusky, had been accepted earlier in the evening.
Minutes later, when the board voted on a resolution setting school property tax rates at 46.78 mills for district residents living in Crawford County and 77.71 mills for district residents living in Mercer County’s French Creek Township, Miller had stepped out of the room and VanTuil joined the majority; that resolution passed 6-0.
A long battle to balance
Nine votes were necessary because balancing the budget at $51.9 million while keeping the increase for Crawford County residents at only 1.9 mills required eliminating a previously-approved $360,000 foreign language program.
During their June 23 study session, board members Schreck, Jones, Christie-Searles and VanTuil had tentatively agreed to eliminate the program. Rothman and Baskan disagreed at the time, while Miller and Prather were absent.
The board’s first vote Monday night was to rescind the resolution adopted Oct. 27, 2008, establishing a new World Language Program. With a 4-4 tie, the resolution failed. Baskan, Miller, Rothman and Schreck successfully managed to keep the program in place, while Christie-Searles, Jones, VanTuil and Prather failed in their effort to have it withdrawn.
After Superintendent Michael Dolecki explained that funding the program would add .88 mills to the budget, upping the 1.9-mill increase to 2.78 mills, “We can’t just throw $360,000 into the budget,” Prather said.
Baskan disagreed, saying that the budget included a “nebulous figure” for the world languages program that could be pared down. “Other cuts are possible,” she added.
Dolecki said that if the budget was passed without rescinding the program, state law would require administrators to whittle out $360,000 in personnel and programs within 24 hours.
Shortly after Schreck announced that he wanted to vote “no” on the budget but that he had to leave the meeting in a few minutes, the vote was taken. With only Jones, Miller and Baskan casting ‘yes’ votes, the budget failed to pass.
At that point, Prather urged board members to reconsider their decision to not rescind the world languages program. However, Carl Moore, the district’s attorney, explained that parliamentary procedure allows only those who originally voted in the majority to make such a motion.