Published March 23, 2008 11:10 pm - “Think of this as a framework as to how we are going to teach in the 21st century,” said Ann Noonen, coordinator of technology of Crawford Central School District. “At the top of the pyramid is our goal — student achievement. At the bottom is our education standards and desired outcomes, and we want whatever we do to be based on those standards.”
Grants eyed to bring technology into classroom
By Penni Schaefer
03/24/08
—
Think “pyramid” — that’s how local leaders have been encouraged to envision the future of their schools.
“Think of this as a framework as to how we are going to teach in the 21st century,” said Ann Noonen, coordinator of technology of Crawford Central School District. “At the top of the pyramid is our goal — student achievement. At the bottom is our education standards and desired outcomes, and we want whatever we do to be based on those standards.”
During a presentation at a recent Crawford Central School Board meeting, Noonen introduced members to the critical role technology plays in the 21st-century educational landscape.
“We’re excited for our students,” she said. “While some teachers elsewhere are still making trasparencies in their multi-media classes, we can give our teachers new tools that will give them different modalities.”
The Classrooms For the Future Grant, which is being considered simultaneously in Crawford Central, Conneaut and PENNCREST school districts, offers them the opportunity to transform high school education.
In all, the Pennsylvania Department of Education is making $20 million available to school districts to pay for technology, equipment and teacher development.
“Our commitment is to improve teaching and learning in English, math, science and social studies and to prepare students for tomorrow’s postsecondary and workforce opportunities,” Noonen said. “This grant would allow us to teach our students to think abstractly, work in teams and to distinguish good information from bad.”
The CFF grant would provide portable wheeled carts containing 25 student laptops and one instructor laptop. Districts also have the option of selecting either Mac or Windows platforms.
Additional grant options include printer/scanners, imaging software, productivity software, a Web cam, an interactive whiteboard, computer-linked projector and digital camera.
The grant limits the schools to three digital cameras and five video cameras per school.
In addition to making the technology hardware available to students, the state Department of Education grant provides a $6,000-per-buiding allotment to cover infrastructure improvements, such as the installation of bracket to hold overhead projectors and the establishment of wireless networks. Districts would be responsible for expenses that exceed the $6,000.
Included in the grant is funding that is earmarked for the professional development of teachers. Support is a key mandatory component of the program because it ensures that instructors realize the maximum potential of the technological investment.
PDE already has a plan in place designed to teach participating personnel how to use the technology. To comply, districts must designate a coach who will oversee the technology.
“Through interactive technology, teachers can implement a variety of teaching methods at once for students to learn,” said Jennifer Galdon, director of secondary curriculum. “For example, a teacher who is doing a lesson about ‘similies’ can use video clips and visual images simultaneously giving students the opportunity to see, hear, etc.”